*/
May 4, 2018 201369397

Commonwealth of Kentucky 

Workers’ Compensation Board

 

 

 

OPINION ENTERED:  May 4, 2018

 

 

CLAIM NO. 201369397

 

 

CARDINAL RIVER INC.                            PETITIONER

 

 

 

VS.        APPEAL FROM HON. MONICA RICE-SMITH,

                 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

 

 

 

JOSEPH SABO and

HON. MONICA RICE-SMITH,

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE                      RESPONDENTS

 

 

AND

 

 

JOSEPH SABO                                    PETITIONER

 

 

VS.

 

 

CARDINAL RIVER INC. and

HON. MONICA RICE-SMITH,

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE                      RESPONDENTS

 

 

OPINION

AFFIRMING

                       * * * * * *

 

BEFORE:  ALVEY, Chairman, STIVERS and RECHTER, Members. 

 

ALVEY, Chairman.   Joseph Sabo (“Sabo”) and Cardinal River, Inc. (“Cardinal River”) appeal from the Opinion, Order and Award rendered November 27, 2017 by Hon. Monica Rice-Smith, Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”).  The ALJ awarded Sabo temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits, permanent total disability (“PTD”) benefits and medical benefits for work-related injuries he sustained on September 2, 2013 while working for Cardinal River.   The ALJ determined Sabo’s award is subject to the tier down provision contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4).  Sabo and Cardinal River also appeal from the January 3, 2018 order denying their petitions for reconsideration.

          On appeal, Sabo argues the ALJ erred in applying the tier-down provision of KRS 342.730(4) as it existed prior to the 1996 changes to the Kentucky Workers’ Compensation Act.  Cardinal River argues the ALJ erred in awarding lifetime benefits subject to the tier down provisions contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4).  Because we determine the ALJ did not err in applying the tier down provision contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4), and additionally because the Kentucky Supreme Court’s holding in Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLC (Dotiki Mine), 529 S.W.3d 759 (Ky. 2017) is final,  we affirm. 

          Sabo filed a Form 101 on May 5, 2017 alleging he injured both legs, right ankle and right heel when he fell from a ladder at work on September 2, 2013.   Sabo worked primarily in maintenance and as a mechanic for various employers until the date of the injury.  He began working for Cardinal River in 2009.  While employed there, he maintained several buildings in downtown Paducah, Kentucky.  He also performed maintenance at his employers’ home. 

          Sabo testified by deposition on July 16, 2017, and at the hearing held September 26, 2017.    Sabo is resident of Paducah, Kentucky.  He is a high school graduate, and had two years of maintenance and welding training.  Sabo sustained previous injuries to his neck and lungs (due to inhalation of hydrofluoric acid) while working for a previous employer.  Both of those injuries had resolved prior to the September 2, 2013 accident.  Sabo was on a ladder at the time of the work accident, removing tree limbs from a structure.  He misstepped while attempting to climb down the ladder and fell.  He landed on both feet, but struck his face numerous times on the ladder as he fell. 

          Sabo’s wife took him to the hospital, and he later underwent two right foot surgeries.  The second surgery included the placement of hardware and screws, which he testified might later require removal.  Sabo testified he had never previously experienced problems with right foot and ankle.  He has not returned to work since the date of the accident except for performing occasional errands for his neighbor.  Sabo testified he has difficulty walking more than two hundred feet at a time, after which he has to rest.  Because of the work-injuries, Sabo takes medication and has had injections.  He also uses a cane prescribed by Dr. William Adams, his treating orthopedic surgeon.

          The parties submitted records and reports from Drs. Adams, Andrew DeGruccio, and Robert M. Weiss.  We will not discuss the medical evidence since it is not pertinent to the issues on appeal.

          A benefit review conference (“BRC”) was held on September 12, 2017.  The BRC Order and Memorandum reflects the issues preserved for resolution included whether Sabo retains the physical capacity to return to the type of work performed at the time of injury, benefits per KRS 342.730, TTD duration, and credit for pre-existing disability/ impairment.

          The ALJ rendered the Opinion, Order and Award on November 27, 2017.  The ALJ found Sabo permanently totally disabled due to the injuries he sustained at work on September 2, 2013, and awarded PTD benefits.  The ALJ granted Cardinal River credit for the overpayment of TTD benefits.  The ALJ determined treatment with Lyrica is reasonable and necessary.  The ALJ additionally determined Sabo’s award is subject to the tier down provision contained in KRS 342.730(4) as it existed prior to the 1996 changes.  She acknowledged the Kentucky Supreme Court found the 1996 changes to that statute unconstitutional in Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLC (Dotiki Mine), supra.  However, she noted the court in Wynn v. Ibold, Inc., 969 S.W.2d 695 (Ky. 1998) had previously determined the statute as it existed prior to 1996 was constitutional.

          Both Sabo and Cardinal River filed petitions for reconsideration.  Sabo argued the ALJ erred in applying the tier down provision contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4) since the decision in Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLC (Dotiki Mine), supra, found the provision unconstitutional.  Cardinal River argued that case was not final, and the ALJ should have ordered Sabo’s benefits terminate as of the date he qualifies for normal old age Social Security retirement benefits rather than lifetime benefits subject to the tier down.  The ALJ denied both petitions for reconsideration by order dated January 3, 2018.

          On appeal, Sabo argues KRS 342.730(4) as it existed prior to the 1996 changes is unconstitutional.  Cardinal River argues the ALJ erred in awarding lifetime benefits subject to the tier down provision contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4).  We disagree, and affirm.

We agree the court found KRS 342.730(4), as amended in 1996, is unconstitutional in Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLC (Dotiki Mine), supra.  That case is now final, and this Board must apply that holding to all decisions that have been timely appealed.  As noted in the holding in Legislative Research Com’n v. Fischer, 366 S.W.3d 905 (Ky. 2012), an unconstitutional statute is null and void from the date of its enactment, and therefore it practically never existed.  The result is that the unconstitutional statute’s pre-amendment version controls.  Mosely v. Commonwealth Dept. of Highways, 489 S.W.2d 511 (Ky. 1972); Commonwealth v. Malco-Memphis Theatres, 169 S.W.2d 596 (Ky. 1943).  In this instance, the 1996 version of KRS 342.730(4), which was an amendment to an existing provision, was found unconstitutional.  Since this was an amendment to an existing statute, the 1994 version is in effect.  

The ALJ appropriately determined the application of the tier down provision contained in KRS 342.730(4) as it existed in 1994 was appropriate.  Because Sabo was not yet 65 years old at the time of his September 2, 2013 work injury, the tier down provision contained in the pre-1996 version of KRS 342.730(4) is applicable.  That version reads as follows:

If the injury or last exposure occurs prior to the employee’s sixty-fifth birthday, any income benefits awarded under KRS 342.750, 342.316, 342.732, or this section shall be reduced by ten percent (10%) beginning at age sixty-five (65) and by ten percent (10%) each year thereafter until and including age seventy (70). Income benefits shall not be reduced beyond the employee’s seventieth birthday.  

That version of KRS 342.730(4) became effective on April 4, 1994.  The full force and effect of the statute has withstood constitutional challenge.  Our appellate courts have held that this statute does not violate age discrimination, equal protection or due process under constitutional guarantees.  See Edwards v. Louisville Ladder, 957 S.W.2d 290 (Ky. App. 1997), and Wynn v. Ibold, Inc., supraIn Wynn v. Ibold, 696 S.W.2d at 697, the Court held as follows:

Keeping in mind that the purpose of workers' compensation legislation is to maintain a stream of income to disabled workers and their dependents, we are persuaded that avoiding a duplication of income benefits is a legitimate state objective and sound public policy. See Brooks v. Island Creek Coal Co., supra. At a time when workers become eligible for other forms of income replacement, not only does KRS 342.730(4) help avoid making it more profitable to be disabled than not, it also serves to reduce the overall cost of maintaining the workers' compensation system, thereby improving the economic climate for all the citizens of the state. We, therefore, conclude that KRS 342.730(4) complies with the requirements of due process and equal protection and is constitutional. See also, Edwards v. Louisville Ladder, Ky. App., 957 S.W.2d 290 (1997).

 

With regard to the argument that the “tier down” of benefits for elderly workers conflicts with Chapter 344, we remind claimant that the legislature was fully aware of Chapter 344 when it enacted KRS 342.730(4) and that Chapter 344 does not pertain to enactments of the legislature. As applied to these facts, Chapter 344 prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of age. Since there is no indication that claimant's employer failed to afford him the full benefit of the Workers' Compensation Act due to his age, we conclude that this argument is without merit.

 

In its brief, Cardinal River argues that House Bill 2 passed in the recent legislative session controls, and therefore this Board should vacate the ALJ’s decision and remand for a determination terminating Sabo’s benefits at age 70.  However, those changes do not become effective until July 14, 2018.  Therefore, because the ALJ’s determination regarding the tier down of Sabo’s benefits is consistent with the previous determination by the Kentucky Supreme Court, it will not be disturbed.

          Accordingly, the November 27, 2017 decision and the January 3, 2018 order on petition for reconsideration issued by Hon. Monica Rice-Smith, Administrative Law Judge, are hereby AFFIRMED.

          ALL CONCUR.

 

 

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER CARDINAL RIVER INC.:

 

HON R CHRISTION HUTSON

PO BOX 995

PADUCAH, KY 42002

 

COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT JOSEPH SABO:

 

HON CHUCK TVEITE

PO BOX 1837

PADUCAH, KY 42002

 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:

 

HON MONICA RICE-SMITH

657 CHAMBERLIN AVE

FRANKFORT, KY 40601